Literature is the mirror of its age. Incomparable scholarly craftsman is one who turns into a mouthpiece and gives a genuine picture of his age with its moment points of interest. Chaucer is an immaculate illustrative of his age. He is in genuine sense a social recorder of England. His verse reflects the fourteenth century not in section yet as a complete entirety.
Realism of Chaucer in “The Canterbury Tales” not provides for us the feeling that whatever has been portrayed is genuine in the standard feeling of the statement. Realism is not reality; it is an aggregate term for the gadgets that give the impact of reality.Chaucer spoke to life in its bareness.
“What he has given is an immediate transpiration of every day life.”
Chaucer’s guideline object of composing verse was to depict men and ladies truthfully without any embellishment and to present a precise picture of normal mankind. He painted life as he saw it, and he saw it with so attentive eye that it appears that he was survey all the occasions and characters through a kaleidoscope. Due to his this quality his age, “The Prolog of the Canterbury Stories” has turned into one of the vivid age of history. Besides he is a man of the world so he blends with numerous types of human kind and he watches the moment idiosyncrasies of personal temperament. “The Canterbury Stories” is a long poetical piece as well as a social history of England. He uncovered just about all the parts of his age and of the individuals along side the point of interest of their appearance, sex calling, clothing and behavior.
Chaucer shed off the impact of the French and Italian models focused around dreams and dreams, whereupon he had worked for so long and entered the plenitude of his own genuine self. He worked like a genuine translator or recorder, relating in a most sensible way, the stories he had listened, without change of wording or tone.
The setting of “The Canterbury Tales” is exceedingly sensible. A journey was a standout amongst the most widely recognized sights in the fourteenth century England. To relate the stories of these travelers, Chaucer gives the figment, not of a fictional universe, yet of genuine one. The all the more true the universe of his setting is, the more his stories by complexity appears as though stories, despite the fact that some to them manage genuine commonplace life. Not at all like Boccaccio, who in his stories rapidly slips go into blunt simulation, Chaucer held reliably to authenticity all through “The Canterbury Stories”.
Gifted with an intense force of perception Chaucer sees things as they may be, and he has the specialty of printing them as he sees them. He doesn’t extend the tint of his preferences and abhorrences, perspectives and biases on what he paints.
“Chaucer sees what is and paints it as he sees it.”
In the depiction of characters in “The Prologue” he provides for us his moment and fragile records of subtle elements in dress, conduct, which makes it a pantomime of perception as from the picture of Prioress:
“She leet no morsel from hir lippes falle,
Ne wette hir fyngres in hir sauce depe,
Wel koude she carie a morsel, and wel kepe
That no drope no fille upon hir brest.”
In “The Canterbury Tales” Chaucer has mixed chuckling and tears, the comic and awful as is found in existence with such case and elegance, that his narrating would appear to be a veracious picture of genuine living. Despite the fact that his journey is remote structure our experience, yet we feel that this is the thing that we may check whether we could turn the clock back few hundreds of years.
Chaucer as a realist displays before us in The Canterbury Stories the throbbing life of the normal individuals. Chaucer’s pioneers talk of “their satchel, their relationships or their private battles”. Their vision is affirmed to the events inside their ward. This is the regular vision of the normal individuals which is sensibly introduced by Chaucer in the Canterbury Tales.
Chaucer’s portrayal of the Shipman speaks to the notable peculiarities of the exchange. The Merchant is an alternate critical figure who implies the changed states of Chaucerian culture.
Chaucer has presented various counterfeit components, yet he does it so skillfully and masterfully that the impression of authenticity he makes, makes us overlook them. He is “mischievously” guileful, and bamboozles us as he ought to with the most honest air on the planet.
In the expressions of Hazlitt:
“There is not counterfeit, pretentious presentation, however a strict miserliness of the writer’s material like the inconsiderate effortlessness of the age in which he existed.”