Hamartia or Tragic Flaw in Oedipus Rex

According to Aristotle, a tragic hero is a recognized individual involving a high position or having a high status in life and in exceptionally prosperous circumstances falling into incident by virtue of a “Hamartia” or some imperfection of character. He ought to be great or fine man however not great. There is nothing to move the emotions of pity or fear in seeing an awful character pass from success into mishap while the ruin of a man who speaks to close flawlessness in the moral sense is hostile and repulsive. The tragic hero is not a moral paragon or a heel. He ought to be genuine to sort, and reliable or genuine to himself. Aristotle would quality disaster or catastrophe in a tragedy to a lapse instead of a planned wrongdoing.

The principle prerequisites of Aristotle with respect to the tragic hero are in this manner (1) high social standing, (2) moral incredibleness or goodness, and (3) some flaw of character, or mistake submitted by the hero in obliviousness. Oedipus replies to all these necessities. Oedipus is a man of illustrious conception; he is raised by a King and a Queen and he himself a while later turns into a King and weds a Queen. He is accordingly a man of social greatness and having fabulous characteristics of character, however his is in no way, shape or form great. We can’t say that his disaster is because of any imperfection in his character, however his imperfections do create the feeling that such a man must pay for his deformities. It would not be right to say that he is a manikin in the hands of destiny. Inside specific breaking points he is a free executor, however it must be perceived that the prescience of the oracle would yet have been satisfied.

Oedipus is a decent lord, an incredible well wisher of his kin, a man of honesty, a legitimate and extraordinary executive and an exceptional judgment. He is a devout man who has confidence in oracles, regards the obligations of family, and scorns debasement. His faith in the predictions of divine beings is the very premise of the entire play. The suppliant individuals approach him just about as a divine being and he is respected as a friend in need. At the point when Creon uncovers the reason for the city’s agony, Oedipus announces his resolution to find the criminal and he articulates an appalling condemnation upon him. We can say that Oedipus is very nearly a perfect King. He additionally shows himself as a gave spouse and a cherishing father. He indicates due thought for the assessments and sentiments of Jocasta and he lavishes all his friendship on his girls. His relations with the Chorus are additionally extremely genial and he demonstrates all due politeness to them. In short both as a man and as a lord Oedipus is deserving of high admiration.

Nonetheless, Oedipus has his flaws. He is hot-tempered, hurried in his judgment, glad for his knowledge, and arbitrary in his choices. He rapidly loses his temper when he finds the prophet hesitant to uncover the things that he knows. He bounced to the conclusion that Teiresias and Creon have incubated a scheme against him. This state of mind of doubt towards the prophet is in sharp complexity to Oedipus’ authentic devotion. Oedipus has a place with the universe of legislative issues and human benchmarks as opposed to the awesome request of the world. His devotion comes up short likewise later on when, affected by Jocasta, he gets to be sort of doubtful in regards to the oracle.

A remarkable feature¬†of Oedipus’ character is an intrinsic feeling of pride in his own particular shrewdness. On account of this presumption, Oedipus positively estranges some of our sensitivity. At the point when fearlessness takes the type of pride, haughtiness, self-importance or rudeness, it gets to be disturbing and unpalatable. His demeanor of prejudice towards both Teiresias and Creon and his exceedingly hostile and offending words to both of them make in us the feeling that he is making ready for his own particular defeat. Obviously, Oedipus has officially carried out the criminal acts which make him a heathen according to the god, in his own particular eyes, and according to other individuals. In any case the tragedy lay in revelation that he is liable of them. If the wrongdoings had stayed obscure there would barely have been any tragedy. Tragedy accompanies the reality for finding both for Jocasta and himself.

It would be a defect in the rationale to say that Oedipus endures on account of his wrongdoing of pride, however his pride is not the immediate reason for his tragedy. He attempted to evade the satisfaction of the predictions made by oracle. He murdered his father and wedded his mother. His tragedy is a tragedy of blunder. If he had been somewhat more watchful, things would have taken a different shape. He may have dodged the fight out and about if he had not been so pleased or hot-tempered; and he may have declined to wed a lady mature enough if he had not been blinded by the pride of his sagacity in illuminating the conundrum of the Sphinx. At the same time, then, the predictions of the oracle would have been satisfied in some other way, in light of the fact that nothing could have been kept their satisfaction. Pride has little to do with Oedipus’ slaughtering his father and wedding his mother.

If Oedipus had not tenaciously sought after his examinations, he may have been saved the stun of disclosure. Something in him drives him advance making progress toward revelation. After Teiresias has initially declined to let him know anything and afterward expressed some alarming predictions. Oedipus is demoralized by Jocasta to proceed with his examinations. Anyway he pays no regard to her reasoning of living at irregular. She endeavors to stop his examinations when she has herself understood reality, however again she fizzled. The Theban shepherd excessively tries, yet futile. It is this request on reality that prompts the disclosure in which lies the tragedy. We may interfere with this request on reality as a manifestation of pride, the pride of keenness, or the pride of knowing everything. The connection of circumstances and end results is unmistakable between Oedipus’ pride of judgment and Oedipus’ finding for his wrongdoings. Be that as it may there is no solid connection between his pride and the genuine submitting of his wrongdoings in light of the fact that the transgressions would have been conferred regardless, if the oracle was to be satisfied. The oracle did say that Oedipus would be liable of those wrongdoings however no oracle said that Oedipus must find reality.

Oedipus is along these lines a bona fide tragic hero in the Aristotelian sense in light of the fact that his tragedy is to the extent that to his drives in uncovering reality as to outside circumstances. To the present day mind, a high social position is not important for the tragic hero nor do they perceive the legitimacy of oracles as well.

In Oedipus we see the powerlessness of man even with the circumstances and his vital enormity. The way in which Oedipus blinds himself in the wake of understanding his blame and in which he persists through his discipline bring him high up in our regard. The soul of Oedipus stays unconquered even in his thrashing and that is the crucial certainty around a tragic hero.

About Saweel Ur Raheem

Check Also

Explain Lawrence’s remarks. “It is strange, the incompatibility of death with life. It is one or the other”.

Q. Explain Lawrence’s remarks. “It is strange, the incompatibility of death with life. It is ...

© Copyrights 2014. All rights are reserved www.latestcontents.com